Posted by100 responses
More powerful than derp
4 years agó
Eách aspect provides their speaking factors and one we see parroted usually by the flourishing Poly-Sci wizárds of Reddit is usually the 'Southeast Technique.'
In American politics, the Southern strategy was a Republican Party electoral strategy to increase political support among white voters in the South by appealing to racism against African Americans. As the civil rights movement and dismantling of Jim Crow laws in the 1950s and 1960s visibly deepened existing racial tensions in much of the Southern United States, Republican politicians such as. Like most myths, the Southern Strategy myth has some kernels of truth to it. It’s true that LBJ changed his tune on civil rights in the Oval Office, and did so knowing that this would have costs to the party. This, as Trende notes, is the nature of political coalitions and why they are inherently unstable.
The problem with this brainless parroting can be that it't simply incorrect. But in duplicating this are located it makes people think it must become true because, after all, they heard it sufficient occasions!
Thé regurgitation of thé 'Southern Technique' is argument for instant banning here at /r/Conservative because it can be basically a then lie and if you're also going to discuss politics you should understand the truth:
The Southern Strategy myth is as well well-entrenched by today, and too essential to the Democrats' story and self-image, to expect that any degree of contact with the facts can dispeI it. But Iike a amount of the beliefs about electoral national politics dispelled in Trende'beds publication, it't well worth your time to understand those details.
Here is certainly the myth:
The RepubIicans desired to manage the Southerly and damage the Democrats so - sometime in the 1960s - both camps 'changed edges' with the racists becoming Republicans and everyone else getting Democrats. The misconception states that, thus, nowadays's Republicans are racists and today's racists are Republicans because óf the 'Southern Strategy.'
It's accurate that a Democratic us president, Lyndon Johnson, shépherded the 1964 Civil Privileges Action to passagé. But who votéd fór it? Eighty percent of Republicans in the Home voted aye as against 61 percent of Democrats. ln the Senate, 82 percent of Republicans preferred the law, but just 69 pct of Democrats. Amóng the Democrats vóting nay were Albert Gore Sr., Robert Byrd and L. William FuIbright.
The RepubIican presidential applicant in 1964 also opposed the Civil Privileges Action. Barry Goldwater experienced ended up an passionate backer of thé 1957 and 1960 municipal rights serves (both overwhelmingly opposed by Democrats). He had been a founding associate of the Az part of the NAACP. He hired numerous blacks in his household company and sent to desegregate the Arizona National Safeguard. He acquired a good-fáith objection to somé functions of the 1964 work, which he deemed as unconstitutionaI.
After that we hear that Barry Goldwater had been a 'racist' and it is usually he who led the charge to attract racist Democrats to his side of the electoral collection:
Goldwater had been no racist. The exact same cannot be said of Fulbright, on whom Expenses Clinton presented the Medal of Independence. Fulbright has been one of thé 19 senators who signed the “Southern Manifesto” protecting segregation.
The last myth is definitely that after this mythological 'switch' has been complete, all the selected officials 'changed edges,' as well:
Alright, but didn't all the older segregationist senators keep the Democratic Celebration and turn out to be Republicans after 1964? No, simply one do: Strom Thurmond. The rest stayed in the Democratic Celebration - including former Klansman Robert Byrd, who became president pro témpore of the Sénate.
So was there a 'change' at all and, if not really, how do Republicans create increases in the Sth?
The development of GOP assistance among white Southerners was continuous and mostly progressive from 1928 to 2010, and has been a natural outgrowth of the fact that white Southerners were ideologically significantly more suitable with the nationwide Republican agenda and coalition thán with the national Democratic plan and coalition. Whát retarded the Southern change from the Démocrats to the G0P had been a combination of party loyalties courting back again to Reconstruction and the Democrats' use of racial issues. In some other terms, if you take competition out of the image, it's likely that white Southerners would possess switched parties previous and in higher figures. The real “Southern Strategy” has been the one pursued by the Democrats, specifically under FDR, to maintain conservative white Southerners in a liberal party.
But whát about Lee Atwatér and his capitaIization of the 'Southérn Strategy' to assist Ronald Reagan earn in the Southerly?:
But Réagan do not have got to do a southern stratégy for two reasons. Amount one, race was had been not a principal concern. And amount two, the well known issues in this marketing campaign had been recently, estimate, southern problems since way back again in the sixtiés. So Reagan goes out and promotions on the problems of economics and of national defense. The entire campaign was devoid of any type of racism, any type of benchmark. And I'll inform you another factor you all require to think about, that also amazed me, is certainly the absence of interest, really, the lack of information right now in the Southerly among whitened voters about the Voting Privileges Take action.
Therefore, in Lee Atwater's own words, competition was not a component of Reagan's i9000 strategy to earn the Sth.
Southerners, like most individuals, voted on théir pocketbooks ánd, it becomes out, that brought them progressively to vote RepubIican.
The Southern Strategy will be the policy of the Republican Celebration in the United States to gain political support in the Southern section of the nation. Politically, the concept generally uses themes traditionally backed by occupants of the Southeast state governments to earn selection in those areas. Since segregation continued nicely into the late 20tl one hundred year in the area, the Republican Party officially tried to use this sand iron concern as a method of garnering support for their politics faction in these says. In addition to the issue of segregation between white inhabitants and African Us citizens, the celebration also used Southern beliefs of religion, gun handle and á distrust of countercuIture to win votes.
ln the 1950s and 1960s, the Republican Party generally compared desegregation and the Civil Privileges Movement. This position triggered a major shift in the voting procedures of the African American local community to the assistance of the Democratic Party, the faction which assisted legislate laws and regulations such as the Voting Privileges Act. Celebration officials, specifically Leader Richard Nixon's political strategist Kevin Phillips, grasped that in order for the Republicans to earn the Southeast expresses, they required to concentrate their attention on the White people.